Comments for ConceptGCC Developer Blog http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com The Design and Implementation of Concepts for C++ Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:54:47 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on Concepts are in C++0x! by Umesh Sirsiwal http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/concepts-are-in-c0x/#comment-2334 Umesh Sirsiwal Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:54:47 +0000 http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-2334 Congratulations. When do you guys think Concepts will find their way to GCC? Congratulations. When do you guys think Concepts will find their way to GCC?

]]> Comment on Concepts are in C++0x! by Steven Woolgar http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/concepts-are-in-c0x/#comment-2333 Steven Woolgar Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:48:25 +0000 http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-2333 Congratulations on this achievement. Good news indeed. Congratulations on this achievement. Good news indeed.

]]> Comment on Concepts are in C++0x! by Jesse Williamson http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/concepts-are-in-c0x/#comment-2332 Jesse Williamson Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:34:21 +0000 http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-2332 Awesome! This is great news. Awesome! This is great news.

]]> Comment on Formal Wording for Concepts by Pauttcib http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/formal-wording-for-concepts/#comment-2327 Pauttcib Sun, 03 Aug 2008 11:13:23 +0000 http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/formal-wording-for-concepts/#comment-2327 Very nice!! Very nice!!

]]> Comment on Default Implementations of Associated Functions by Tristan Wibberley http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/default-implementations-of-associated-functions/#comment-2326 Tristan Wibberley Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:39:32 +0000 http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/default-implementations-of-associated-functions/#comment-2326 EqualityComparable should provide a default operator != in terms of operator==, rather than the other way round. !operator!=() is usually implementable faster than operator==(). EqualityComparable should provide a default operator != in terms of operator==, rather than the other way round. !operator!=() is usually implementable faster than operator==().

]]> Comment on Default Implementations of Associated Functions by Douglas Gregor http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/default-implementations-of-associated-functions/#comment-2324 Douglas Gregor Thu, 08 May 2008 21:46:41 +0000 http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/default-implementations-of-associated-functions/#comment-2324 No, there isn't. No, there isn’t.

]]> Comment on Default Implementations of Associated Functions by Loïc Joly http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/default-implementations-of-associated-functions/#comment-2323 Loïc Joly Thu, 08 May 2008 20:28:34 +0000 http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/default-implementations-of-associated-functions/#comment-2323 Is there a way to specify the auto concept so that it can match in three cases : - Both operator== and operator!= are defined - operator== only is defined - operator!= only is defined Is there a way to specify the auto concept so that it can match in three cases :
- Both operator== and operator!= are defined
- operator== only is defined
- operator!= only is defined

]]> Comment on Default Implementations of Associated Functions by Douglas Gregor http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/default-implementations-of-associated-functions/#comment-2322 Douglas Gregor Thu, 08 May 2008 17:16:15 +0000 http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/default-implementations-of-associated-functions/#comment-2322 In that case, the auto concept will not match. In that case, the auto concept will not match.

]]> Comment on Default Implementations of Associated Functions by Loïc Joly http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/default-implementations-of-associated-functions/#comment-2321 Loïc Joly Thu, 08 May 2008 16:42:41 +0000 http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/default-implementations-of-associated-functions/#comment-2321 What if, in that case, T only defines operator!= ? What if, in that case, T only defines operator!= ?

]]> Comment on Default Implementations of Associated Functions by James http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/default-implementations-of-associated-functions/#comment-2315 James Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:22:43 +0000 http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/default-implementations-of-associated-functions/#comment-2315 I weep tears of joy that there has been no news on ConceptGCC for so long. If only I could play with yet more C++ wizadry using g++. I weep tears of joy that there has been no news on ConceptGCC for so long. If only I could play with yet more C++ wizadry using g++.

]]>