<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ConceptGCC Developer Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>The Design and Implementation of Concepts for C++</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:19:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on What Happened in Frankfurt? by Douglas Gregor</title>
		<link>http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2009/08/06/what-happened-in-frankfurt/#comment-2341</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Gregor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-2341</guid>
		<description>The contents of the ConceptGCC blog will remain publicly accessible; I just won&#039;t be adding any new content here. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The contents of the ConceptGCC blog will remain publicly accessible; I just won&#8217;t be adding any new content here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Happened in Frankfurt? by Niels Dekker</title>
		<link>http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2009/08/06/what-happened-in-frankfurt/#comment-2340</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels Dekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/?p=44#comment-2340</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Doug. Once you&#039;ve closed the ConceptGCC blog, will the contents still be publicly accessible (read-only) somewhere? I hope so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Doug. Once you&#8217;ve closed the ConceptGCC blog, will the contents still be publicly accessible (read-only) somewhere? I hope so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Concepts are in C++0x! by Niels Dekker</title>
		<link>http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/concepts-are-in-c0x/#comment-2339</link>
		<dc:creator>Niels Dekker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-2339</guid>
		<description>Hi Doug,

It was very nice meeting you in Frankfurt. I see Dave and you have just opened a new website, http://cpp-next.com  Great!

I&#039;d recommend anyone else reading your blog to also check http://cpp-next.com

Kind regards, Niels</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Doug,</p>
<p>It was very nice meeting you in Frankfurt. I see Dave and you have just opened a new website, <a href="http://cpp-next.com" rel="nofollow">http://cpp-next.com</a>  Great!</p>
<p>I&#8217;d recommend anyone else reading your blog to also check <a href="http://cpp-next.com" rel="nofollow">http://cpp-next.com</a></p>
<p>Kind regards, Niels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Concepts are in C++0x! by Jesse</title>
		<link>http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/concepts-are-in-c0x/#comment-2338</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 08:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-2338</guid>
		<description>NC++0x has many &quot;selling points&quot;-- heck, C++ as it /now/ has many &quot;selling points&quot;!

I&#039;m still reading Bjarne Stroustrup&#039;s &quot;Simplifying Concepts&quot;. It is great-- I mean, great-- reading, even though it is obviously an unpolished piece written for a fairly narrow audience. (&quot;http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2906.pdf&quot;)

Stroustrup has written a post for Dr. Dobb&#039;s:
&quot;http://www.ddj.com/cpp/218600111&quot;

I&#039;ve seen another from Danny Kalev. I haven&#039;t followed any other discussions yet, so I&#039;m a bit out of the loop: this is &quot;news to me&quot;, too.

Personally, I get a sense that Dr. Stroustrup does seem determined to assuage bitterness. Think of the work that&#039;s gone into this!! Read his essay to understand some of the problems, and the article for some so-called reconciliation (in the sense that it gives me, the fight is far from over!). Seven-plus years of work on a project you care about and untold numbers of programmers use or are affected by each day doesn&#039;t disappear easily.

I was stunned by the news, too. Concepts were indeed highly vaunted, and rightly so. The trouble is... well, I&#039;m sure that Dr. Gregor will write something thoughtful (ahem... Doug.. ;).

I&#039;m looking forward to C++0whatever. Heck, just the &quot;auto&quot; keyword alone will help with many of my (sob!) personal problems in daily coding &quot;getting the job done&quot;. The &quot;little&quot; features mean a lot to ordinary mortals.

But, it&#039;s very, very important to get at the fundamentals. C++ is a brilliant software engineering language, with a lot of strength. Each choice from the committee will impact untold lines of code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NC++0x has many &#8220;selling points&#8221;&#8211; heck, C++ as it /now/ has many &#8220;selling points&#8221;!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still reading Bjarne Stroustrup&#8217;s &#8220;Simplifying Concepts&#8221;. It is great&#8211; I mean, great&#8211; reading, even though it is obviously an unpolished piece written for a fairly narrow audience. (&#8220;http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2906.pdf&#8221;)</p>
<p>Stroustrup has written a post for Dr. Dobb&#8217;s:<br />
&#8220;http://www.ddj.com/cpp/218600111&#8243;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen another from Danny Kalev. I haven&#8217;t followed any other discussions yet, so I&#8217;m a bit out of the loop: this is &#8220;news to me&#8221;, too.</p>
<p>Personally, I get a sense that Dr. Stroustrup does seem determined to assuage bitterness. Think of the work that&#8217;s gone into this!! Read his essay to understand some of the problems, and the article for some so-called reconciliation (in the sense that it gives me, the fight is far from over!). Seven-plus years of work on a project you care about and untold numbers of programmers use or are affected by each day doesn&#8217;t disappear easily.</p>
<p>I was stunned by the news, too. Concepts were indeed highly vaunted, and rightly so. The trouble is&#8230; well, I&#8217;m sure that Dr. Gregor will write something thoughtful (ahem&#8230; Doug.. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to C++0whatever. Heck, just the &#8220;auto&#8221; keyword alone will help with many of my (sob!) personal problems in daily coding &#8220;getting the job done&#8221;. The &#8220;little&#8221; features mean a lot to ordinary mortals.</p>
<p>But, it&#8217;s very, very important to get at the fundamentals. C++ is a brilliant software engineering language, with a lot of strength. Each choice from the committee will impact untold lines of code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Concepts are in C++0x! by Nicolas</title>
		<link>http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/concepts-are-in-c0x/#comment-2337</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-2337</guid>
		<description>And today, concepts were voted off C++0x. What selling point does 0x have now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And today, concepts were voted off C++0x. What selling point does 0x have now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Concepts are in C++0x! by Umesh Sirsiwal</title>
		<link>http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/concepts-are-in-c0x/#comment-2334</link>
		<dc:creator>Umesh Sirsiwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-2334</guid>
		<description>Congratulations. When do you guys think Concepts will find their way to GCC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations. When do you guys think Concepts will find their way to GCC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Concepts are in C++0x! by Steven Woolgar</title>
		<link>http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/concepts-are-in-c0x/#comment-2333</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Woolgar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-2333</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on this achievement.  Good news indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on this achievement.  Good news indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Concepts are in C++0x! by Jesse Williamson</title>
		<link>http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2008/09/25/concepts-are-in-c0x/#comment-2332</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 17:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/?p=42#comment-2332</guid>
		<description>Awesome! This is great news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! This is great news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Formal Wording for Concepts by Pauttcib</title>
		<link>http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/formal-wording-for-concepts/#comment-2327</link>
		<dc:creator>Pauttcib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 11:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/03/15/formal-wording-for-concepts/#comment-2327</guid>
		<description>Very nice!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Default Implementations of Associated Functions by Tristan Wibberley</title>
		<link>http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/default-implementations-of-associated-functions/#comment-2326</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Wibberley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conceptgcc.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/default-implementations-of-associated-functions/#comment-2326</guid>
		<description>EqualityComparable should provide a default operator != in terms of operator==, rather than the other way round. !operator!=() is usually implementable faster than operator==().</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EqualityComparable should provide a default operator != in terms of operator==, rather than the other way round. !operator!=() is usually implementable faster than operator==().</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>